一、检查情况
A general cargo ship built in year 2012 was inspected.Among other things,the following deficiency was issued by the PSCO,which the RO disagreed with.
一艘 2012年建造的货船, PSC检查期间, PSCO开具的以下缺陷,RO有异议: 07120 Width of Em’cy escape trunk from E/R not reach to 800 mm at lower plate (code 17/70)
二、 RO主张
The RO expressed the view that the width of the emergency escape trunk would not be affected by this small metal piece that was cut-off. Moreover, from a structural point of view, this cut-out may cause shear forces if not considering the underneath supporting structure and may create a hard-point.
RO认为机舱应急逃生通道的宽度不受图中结构的影响,从结构上考虑,这个点切掉而不采取相应的措施将引起剪切应力。
三、相关参考材料
四、东京备忘录研讨结论
1.Is the escape trunk in question affected by the piece of fitting/cut-off substantially (i.e.less than 600mm)?
1.本案例中逃生通道的宽度受焊接点的影响么?
2.It would be more prudent to discuss and confirem with the flag and/or RO about such kind of matter and on the action to taken.
2.当遇到本案例中的情况时,与RO或船旗国沟通、讨论之后再决定更为妥当。
3.Apart from the deficiency, please be reminded that action code 70 is an inspection action code rather than a deficiency action code.Therefore it should not be used against specific deficiency.
3.避开本案例的缺陷不谈, PSCO应该注意的是: 行动代码 70是一个检查代码而不是一个缺陷代码,不应该用在具体缺陷之中。
五、问题探讨
What do you think about this deficiency?
你对该缺陷的看法是?
免责申明:本文仅代表作者观点,不代表中国海员之家立场。其真实性及原创性未能得到中国海员之家证实,在此感谢原作者的辛苦创作,如转载涉及版权等问题,请作者与我们联系,我们将在第一时间处理,谢谢!联系邮箱:cnisu@foxmail.com
评论 (0人参与)